February 10, 2012

House tie vote, win for Governor

Unlike in sports, sometimes in the field of politics, a tie is as good as a win. On Wednesday afternoon as the House jumped to the task of working on Governor’s Sanford’s 47 vetoes to the state budget, one of the more interesting votes occurred on the item of the prohibition on the Highway Patrol recouping costs from game day traffic control, which is part of the nearly one million dollars it costs the Highway Patrol to provide traffic enforcement for special events around the state.   Anderson County Representative Dan Cooper spoke in favor of overriding the Governor’s veto. “This has been in there for quite sometime. We view this as a public safety issue. When there is a lot of traffic for various events be it Clemson or Carolina football games or Darlington Raceway. As Mr. (Marlboro County Representative Doug) Jennings just told me, NASCAR had to start making some payments for traffic control at Darlington. We might just lose the only race we still got down there so I ask you to Override this veto.”

Richland County Representative Nathan Ballentine sided with the Governor.”I”m a big Gamecock fan and we got several tiger fans and there are several other sporting events out there. Can’t these universities cover this? Let them pay instead of using state tax dollars. think of all the people. we represent four million people. we don’t have four million people who need this service. the people at the ball games and other events might. I simply ask that we sustain this (veto).

in the end the vote was so close it nearly confused House Speaker Bobby Harrell who announced the final vote tally. “By a vote of 58-58 the House sustains, excuse me; yes, the House sustains the veto.”

Virtual schools in public school choice plan

State senators OK’d a plan to expand public school choice –which includes the role of virtual schools, says Senate Education Committee Chairman John Courson:  ”I think the fact that we need to give more options and we have done that and it’s improved the quality of education in South Carolina.”

South Carolina accredited, Internet-based instruction programs are cropping up all over the state—like the newest online school in the state Provost Academy.
Dr. Darrell Johnson, the executive director says this public charter high school is not only an alternative for students, but for teachers, especially those looking for work because of budget cuts.

“Our teachers online do not have to spend the time grading lots of papers. They, in turn, spend their time dealing with direct instruction with their
Johnson says the online instructor needs to be adaptable, but the pay-off is that there are few supervisory tasks, like bus or lunchroom duties.

He says they are hiring for 10 teachers plus guidance counselors and special education teachers, and they are getting hundreds of applications. Applicants have to be South Carolina certified, but they don’t have to live here.

“With the proximity of Savannah, Charlotte, Augusta, you see we can recruit the teachers who live in those states and even now work in our state,” says Johnson.”

Teachers in charter virtual schools do have to spend some scheduled time, in person, with students.

Governor sidetracks legislators on rail line dispute

Governor Mark Sanford vetoed an amendment that would have transferred a highly disputed rail line project to a state agency. North Charleston residents oppose expansion of railways through their city into an expanded Port of Charleston.

“As governor, that’s not my role deciding where a rail line is or isn’t going to go. I just gotta look at the bigger principles involved on some of these major issues and if it’s on an agreement that was struck I just don’t think it should be basically redone via legislative edict and if folks wanna redo it down there, again, all the interested parties oughta come together, have a food fight, a debate, a conversation and see if they come up with something else,” says Sanford.

If Sanford did not veto the measure, the state agency would have given state lawmakers more flexibility to open the northern end of the port for rail access. The State Ports Authority and the city of North Charleston signed a memorandum in 2002 that stated there would be no rail lines run through the northern end of the property. Now, that has changed. Sanford says the State Ports Authority should have kept its word.

“Our point was you can’t have an agreement that was brought about, however imperfect it might have been, and then a couple years later have folks party to a legislative chain that would really undo the spirit it was agreed upon,” says Sanford.

Sanford says a negotiation could be reached if state lawmakers in Columbia would pull out of the issue and just let local officials handle it.

In the Senate, Lowcountry lawmakers battled it out amongst themselves, stalling discussion on other statewide issues. House lawmakers Wednesday decided not to over-ride that veto.

Mayor rallies against rail expansion

The ongoing battle for rail line expansion into the Port of Charleston continues, as North Charleston Mayor Keith Summey and some 300 residents rallied Tuesday night in objection. Mayor Summey says the plan to run rail lines through the northern end of the port undermines an earlier agreement with the State Ports Authority. Summey says the issue at hand is a broken agreement.

“It’s like we’re being pushed on. The memorandum of understanding says no rail through the north end of the base. The State Ports Authority said they never needed any rail, but when we did the memorandum of understanding we said rail can’t go through the south because we felt they did need rail. The issue is Norfolk Southern and CSX can both have access, it means that one has to cross the other one’s lines,” says Summey.

Which, Summey says is done in Savannah and Virginia, so he doesn’t understand why the two companies cannot overpass in North Charleston. Summey says this issue has reached beyond North Charleston, it’s a statewide issue.

“When the state government comes in and tells you they’re gonna do something, you do everything you’re doing based upon that commitment, and all of a sudden they just back away and say ‘we don’t have to do that;’ that’s wrong,” says Summey.

Summey says he’s ready to fight any attempt by South Carolina lawmakers to bring these rail lines through an area he has plans to revitalize.

House passes amber alert expansion measure

A measure that would expand the scope of the state’s Amber Alert system received third reading in the House Wednesday and now moves on to the Senate. The amended legislation states that when any person who suffers from a cognitive disability, including dementia, goes missing and is believed to be on the roadways in South Carolina, the Amber Alert system can be used to locate that person. Bill sponsor Horry County Representative Alan Clemmons says right now the system is only used to locate missing youngsters.”Let’s say grandma, who is in a nursing home, goes missing at the same time a car in the parking law goes missing and it had a key in the ignition. You now with this legislation will be able to advertise the vehicle that’s missing with grandma. Under the current amber alert law that is not allowed. You can only used it for missing children.”

Clemmons says there is strong indication that the legislation will pass, but not until 2010. “There are some strong advocates for the bill over in the Senate. I don’t think it’s going to happen this year. I think they’re bogged downed in the Senate with other issues, but I feel like in January that they will be taking it up as one of their first issues.”

Charleston County Representative Chip Limehouse suggested Tuesday that lawmakers look into cross state activation of the Amber Alert system noting for example that when an amber alert is activated in Hardeeville, South Carolina the amber alert is not activated in Savannah, Georgia which is less than 20 miles away.