February 10, 2012

Democrat responds to high court decision

The democratic response has been loud to Governor Mark Sanford losing against the two stimulus funds lawsuits. The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Sanford must accept $700 million in stabilization money.

Vincent SheheenKershaw County Senator Vincent Sheheen says the expenditure of taxpayers’ money, caused by the lawsuits and Sanford’s refusal, is ironic, since we are in a recession and every bit of cash is needed by the state.   “The whole dispute is really full of irony.  We had a governor who ran to the federal courts to block his own state from accepting tax dollars, which of course meant that we were spending more tax dollars in litigation while everyone was awaiting a decision, and it was really a complete waste of time.”

Sheheen says the stimulus issue, and the state almost losing the funds, was not a good reason for South Carolina to stand out.  “Every other state in the union excepted their own tax dollars back and put them where there supposed to be, toward education and law enforcement.  And it’s really sad we went through all of this.  And I’m optimistic this will be a turning  point for the state and people will realize that we can’t fight about these things any more, we have to pull together and work on those issues which are so important. “

Ed. Supt. “relieved” by Surpreme Court ruling

Jim RexState Superintendent of Education Jim Rex says the South Carolina Supreme Court ruling against Governor Mark Sanford paves the way for federal stabilization funds to be available in time to send to local school districts to help students next school year.  

Rex was excited about the decision but exasperated at the same time.    “I’m glad about the ruling, but I’m sorry it took so long and that we had to go to the courts to determine what 49 other states and governors figured out many months ago.”   

Rex says he is hearing a big sigh of relief from local school districts. Many of them have already had to lay off teachers due to the recession. Rex says now the districts can move ahead and approve budgets that save teaching positions that were going to be cut, and save programs that were on “life support.”

Rex says class sizes were really going to increase next year as a result of cuts if the stimulus funds had not been allowed. He says it is hard for school districts to run schools without proper funding and state budget cuts have made it hard.  “We actually had to go to the courts, and we’re out of step with what other states are doing to be competitive.  ‘Better late than never’ is a phrase I would prefer to stop using, frankly, when it comes to moving our state forward.”

Sanford: court ruling illustrates power imbalance

By a 5-0 vote The South Carolina Supreme Court Thursday ordered Governor Mark Sanford to accept $700 million in disputed stimulus money included in the state budget. With the vote, the court ruled in favor of school administrators and two South Carolina students who brought two separate lawsuits against Governor Sanford. Sanford called the ruling a big loss for state taxpayers and a huge loss to the concept of the balance of power in state government.

“In South Carolina in many ways we don’t have three branches of government, we have one, and power and authority is too often rooted in the General Assembly in South Carolina. That is not to speak ill of individual members of the General Assembly but to say we have a fundamentally flawed governmental structure that impedes and hurts progress in the state of South Carolina.”

Sanford says he will sign the papers to formally request the stimulus money on Monday.

Sanford says the Governor of South Carolina is elected by voters from across the state and is noted as the Chief Executive of the state, and yet in the state’s fundamentally flawed system, legislators voted in by smaller electorates wheel power and influence that affects the entire state.

“What we have now is a system where you can have a handful of senior legislators, elected from safe districts simply because of a seniority system, accrue very large chunks of power, be elected by nothing more than a couple of thousand folks in one corner of our state or another, in essence be the driver of what futures governors do or don’t do. I think that has horrifying ramifications in terms of the functioning of our government.”

Sanford says the state has loss a huge opportunity to significantly reduce the growing state debt. The windfall of federal government funds coming to the state in the form of stimulus dollars could have been used for that purpose. Sanford says the state will feel the growing burden of more debt in the near future. “With these federal funds, we have papered over what was an historic chance to do something about a whole host of programs that could have been reformed or changed and I think that will prove to be a giant mistake.”

Sanford says he fears that ultimately with this ruling his successor will be facing an insurmountable sea of debt and a likely uncooperative legislature with no ideas of how to solve the problem.

“We will end up with a very, very significant financial hole, almost a billion dollars. I think for the next governor that follows me, because these funds will run out about then, I wish him the best of luck and my prayers in doing so, because i think at that point the General Assembly will be coming back to the Governorship looking for suggestions on how you get out of giant hole we will have created for ourselves.”

Winning attorneys react to Supreme Court ruling

 The South Carolina Supreme Court’s  unanimous ruling in favor of  two students and statewide association of educators means that South Carolina will apply for $700 million in economic stimulus money.

For attorneys Dwight Drake and Dick Harpootlian, it is swift vindication. He and Drake have been criticized by the governor’s office for their backgrounds and motives: Harpootlian as a Democratic Party operative and Drake as a lobbyist for various interests, including video poker.

They represented Chapin High school student Casey Edwards, and University of South Carolina law school student Justin Williams in the first case argued Wednesday before the five-judge  panel.  According to Harpootlian, he and Drake devised this legal approach and then found Edwards through Bud Ferillo, a well-known Democratic strategist. [Read more...]

Gov. Sanford must take stimulus money

In a 5-0 vote, the South Carolina Supreme Court has ordered Governor Mark Sanford to apply for the $700 million in federal stimulus cash. The court heard the arguments Wednesday of two lawsuits  to force Sanford to apply for the money, as he objected saying he wanted to use the money to pay down state debt. U.S. District Judge Joe Anderson sent those two cases back to state court on Monday after the governor tried to have them removed to federal court.

Most of the money is expected to go toward cash-strapped schools in the next two years.

Listen to press conferenceMP3