May 17, 2012

Challenges to DHEC permits to Duke Energy on hold

The Department of Health and Environmental Control Board  meeting in Columbia to consider a request by two environmental groups  for a hearing to appeal permits issued by DHEC to Duke Energy was cancelled Thursday morning. A conference call is scheduled for a later date. The Coastal Conservation League and American Rivers says the the decision by DHEC to grant licenses to Duke Energy to operate dams in the state on the Catawba and Wateree Rivers will impact South Carolina’s water future for the next half century.Coastal Conservation League Columbia Office Director Patrick Moore says the license agreement Duke Energy is applying for and DHEC is certifying says that the South Carolina needs only 25 percent of the water that is supposed to be in the river on average and it doesn’t need to be seasonably variable. Moore says 25 percent is not a sufficient stream flow for wildlife or people who use the river and seasonal rainfall dictates that flows should vary during the year.

“Every year no matter how much it rains, it rains more in the Spring, Fall and Winter than it does in the Summer. You don’t get an even amount of rain all year long. You get more at certians and less at certain times, and that pattern that has been consistant throughout time basically is what the natural resources depend on. If you flatline it, that will have a significant impact on the fish and wildlife.”

Moore says their is concern about Duke Energy’s agreement with the state to exchange minimum water flows with the protection of some areas of shore land along the river. “The bottom line is you can’t replace water with land. once you take the water out of the stream, the land is not going to do anything to replace the benefits and services that the water provided such as recreation, fish and wildlife habitat, use for drinking water and industry downstream. You’re not replacing any of those lost values with this land protection.

Moore says Duke Energy’s proposed amount of water flow allowed into South Carolina from the rivers runs counter to the lawsuit that South Carolina has pending in the u.s. supreme court versus the state of North Carolina. “South Carolina is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to equitably allocate our water resources in the Catawba-Wateree river basin with the state of North Carolina. However we have two state agencies that have just signed off on an agreement that we only need 25 percent and that sounds like an inherent conflict on the part of the state. That is something that could impact the Supreme Court case with North Carolina.”

The two state agencies Moore is alluding to is DHEC and the Department of Natural Resources.

Moore says ultimately the decision to grant licenses to Duke Energy under the current agreement would set an unsettling precedent for possible future deals with businesses and municipalities in the state of Georgia. “It is easy to see how Atlanta or North Georgia wants to stick a pipe in the Savannah and attempt to make a similar argument that this is the setup you have with Duke Energy and we deserve a similar consideration. We’ve got lots of land. We don’t have as much water. It makes sense to protect the more finite resource.”

Moore says it is hoped that the conference call by the DHEC board will be held next week. If a hearing on the challenge is granted it would be held within 60 days. If the the board declines, the environmental groups will appeal to the state’s Administrative Law Court.

SC Governor applies, Speaker approves

Speaker of the House Bobby FarrellNow that Governor Mark Sanford has applied for the $700 million in stimulus cash, Speaker of the House Bobby Harrell says he didn’t agree with what the money was intended to do.

“I completely disagreed with what they did in Washington creating the stimulus money because what they did was they borrowed money for operating budgets. It’s alright to borrow money to build a building to borrow money to buy equipment, but to borrow money simply to operate government and pay salaries and things like that for a year or two, which is what they did, is a very bad economic thing to do and I strongly disagree with what they did in Washington,” says Harrell.

However, after stimulus package was approved, Harrell says South Carolina taking the money was something that needed to be done.

“Once they did it, and it was the law of the land, and everybody across the country was going to pay taxes to pay that money back whether we take our share or not, it didn’t make sense to me to say ‘don’t give us our money, we’ll pay our share of taxes paying it back, we’re okay with that, we just don’t want our money, give our money to someone else,” says Harrell.

Harrell says he wasn’t sure if Sanford was going to apply for the money.

“I don’t know if we did know it. It was up to him whether or not he wanted to apply for it, he didn’t have to if he didn’t want to. It was completely in his court, and that’s where we find ourselves. Frankly, I was concerned that he might not,” says Harrell.

Most of the money will go toward public schools in the state, and Sanford said Monday he is only taking it because of the Supreme Court order. Harrell says it seems to serve as a block for cutting jobs in education.

“I think if two years from now if the economy doesn’t come back any, and we are in the same position we are in economically except we don’t have the stimulus money, that in two years we would make the cuts that we would be making right now. Without the stimulus money, we’d just be making cuts right now, instead the cuts have been delayed for two years. I hope the money goes to the classroom level, to the kids like it supposed to go. A lot of the money flows directly to the school districts and all we have the authority to do is to accept it or reject it,” says Harrell.

Harrell says even with the stimulus dollars, the school districts still have less money in their budget than last year.