Flames from the Governor Mark Sanford controversy have died down. A rally calling for Sanford’s impeachment at the statehouse Thursday was attended by less than 80 people. Most Democrats and Republicans have stopped commenting on the issue. Governor Sanford has said that he has no intention of resigning. But it’s never-the-less important to understand the process of impeachment.If Sanford would resign or be removed from office, the Lt. Governor would take the Governor’s seat for the remainder of his term. But the proceedings leading up to that would be time-consuming, according to Dr. James Underwood, Distinguished Professor Emeritus at the USC Law School. [Read more...]
Summit to focus on state’s energy future
Frank discussions about the state’s energy future will be featured during the 2009 South Carolina Energy Summit at Columbia’s Metropolitan Convention Center Monday. The summit is being sponsored by the South Carolina Minority Business Enterprise Center. Representatives from the fields of Engineering, Business, Industry, Education and Government will be on hand for the day long summit to discuss alternative types of energy, mantaining the state and the nation’s energy security, and meeting the greater energy demands of a growing population and a growing industrial community.6th District Congressman James Clyburn will be one of the features speakers at the summit. Santee Cooper Director of Government and Community Relations Richard Kizer says his message will center on the challenge that utilities face of incorporating alternative forms of energy with coal and nuclear in order to keep energy at a low cost for business and residential customers.
“South Carolina has benefitted for years now from having reliable low cost power. We have benefitted by recruitng industry and improving the quality of life for everyone who lives here. We have benefitted from low cost energy in the past, its driven our economy, so we have to ask ourselves “how do we maintain that going forward?.”
Kyzer says today the state relies on coal and nuclear for the bulk of its energy generation and while alternative fuels will be incorporated on the grid, coal and nuclear will remain the staple for the foreseeable future.
“Currently we have a state that is receiving about 61% of its energy from coal and about 30% from nuclear. So the bulk of our energy is coming from those two sources. 15 years from now I don’t know if there’s a big change in that, but you’ll start seeing a change probably 10, 15, 20 years from now where you’ll see more renewables on the systems.”
In the not too distant future, Kyzer envisions utility companies offering a variety of alternative energy choices in an effort to augment coal and nuclear generation. ” you’ll see Methane gas, more biomass projects, possibly some wind projects, and if technology moves along you could see more solar projects. I think that’s where you’ll see the change and that will be how I believe the industry looks different 10, 15. 20 years from now.”
Kyzer says renewables will be an integral part but not be the total answer for our future energy needs. A mixture of the alternative and traditional forms of energy generation makes the best sense from an economical point of view.
Kyzer says polls indicate that people want more alternative or green energy choices, but they do not follow through on requesting the alternative energies that may be available because affordablity takes precedent when households and businesses are keeping a keen eye on the bottom line.
“Survey results show a lot of interest, but in the actual sign up and follow through there is a disconnect. But regardless, we’re still pursuing them. That is the way of the future. You’re going to see utilities putting more renewables online but part of that message that we have to communicate is when they come online those renewables sources are going to be more expensive than our traditional generation.”
Kyzer says as technology improves in the future, alternative energies will likely become less expensive for the consumer.
Smart leaves 4th Dist. race
There is now one less candidate in the Republican primary for the 4th Congressional district race. Greenville county businessman Andrew Smart announced he is dropping out of the race and throwing his support to Spartanburg county solicitor Trey Gowdy.
“I got in this race to make a difference,” said Smart. “It wasn’t going to be about me. I found another candidate who could make a difference. And spending time listening to his positions, what he would do, I told him he was a guy I could support.”
The 4th district seat is currently held by Republican Bob Inglis.
Death Penalty sought in shooting of eight year old
Spartanburg County 7th Circuit Solicitor Trey Gowdy is seeking the death penalty for a suspect in the killing of an eight year old girl at a Chesnee home Wednesday. 50 year old Ricky Lee Blackwell was served the notice in the hospital where he is recovering from a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the stomach. Investigators says Blackwell put eight year old Heather Brooke Center in a headlock then shot her in the head and fired three more shots into her as she fell. Blackwell then shot himself in the stomach. The girl was the daughter of Blackwell’s estranged wife’s boyfriend. Gowdy labled the girl’s killing an execution.
“Frankly, the paradigm that I use is the circumstances of the crime, the character of the defendant, and the impact the victim’s death has on the community. All of that fits under the rubric of does it shock the community and I can tell you it shocked the conscience of the solicitor, the sheriff, the coroner and everyone else i’ve talked to.”
Gowdy served the notice to Blackwell approximately 24 hours after the fatal shooting of the eight year old girl. “Was it quick? I don’t know. I ‘ll leave that to others to judge. It was a very easy decision for me to make. If you are going to execute a child, then you are going to stand trial for society’s ultimate punishment, and there really isn’t a lot of thought process that really needs to go into that.”
Gowdy says in his experience it does take some time to bring a death penalty case to trial and in this particular instance the recovery time of the suspect does carry some consideration, but the more important aspect usually is the time it takes the attorneys for the defense to prepare their case.
“It’s usually not prosecutors that need more time. Our case is relatively straight forward. We’ll be ready by this fall, but it want be tried this fall. I would hope we can get it tried next summer or next fall. I can just tell you this, I’m going to be there when it’s tried.”
Inglis outraged with Obama
Back in October of 2008, the Bush Administration revised the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) as part of the $700 billion bailout of the U.S. financial system. Now the Obama Administration wants to use interest accrued by banking repayment of TARP to create nrew government programs for homeowners. This has outraged U.S. Representative Bob Inglis (R-SC) of South Carolina’s Fourth District. Inglis says this in a horrible idea.
“To redstribute the money from taxpayers to certain groups that they want to support,” said Inglis. “In other words, people who are having trouble with their mortgages or whatever.
“Can you imagine a worse idea? Are these people insistent on redistributing wealth in America? Apparently so.”
According to the report, $6.5 billion in TARP repayment funds would be used to assist struggling homeowners and low-income renters. Inglis says the monies should be used to repay the debt. “Probably the worst idea I’ve heard from this administration (is) to take the TARP money that is being repayed by the banks that should come back to the taxpayers. Because in the case of TARP 1 we’ve made a $350 billion investment. About $80 billion has been repayed. They’re paying interest as well so it could turn out to be a pretty good deal for the taxpayers, at least TARP 1,” he said.
Inglis says the bailout was necessary and that the current administration is misusing taxpayer’s money. According to Inglis, “We kept the financial system from collapsing. Well, that was a good thing. But now, when they are paying it back. To take that money and redistribute it to people that the Obama Administration finds worthy of getting the money that should be coming back






