May 17, 2012

Sen. Grooms offers bill to assert state’s rights

The General Assembly gets back to business next week, with a list of pre-filed bills to consider and others still sitting in committees.

Senate Transportation Committee Chairman Larry Grooms has filed a bill to tell Congress they disapprove of current cap and trade legislation that is now in the Senate.  Grooms explained, “As an official declaration to Congress, should it pass, it would send a strong message that South Carolina does not support cap and trade, but we would look for some other types of renewable energy standards, and that should be left up to the state.”

Senator Lindsey Graham is trying to hammer out a compromise plan for cap and trade.  Grooms, who is running for governor, says he met with his fellow Republican. “To him (Sen. Graham), I expressed my thoughts, that it would be very harmful to South Carolina for some type of cap and trade mandates from the federal government to be passed.  I am now introducing that as a resolution, and hope to gain support from other members of the General Assembly.”

This is a concurrent resolution which would simply serve as the official South Carolina statement on the issue.

Another similar bill in debate that will be taken up when lawmakers return, is a statement of state’s rights versus federal.

Groom says the “sovereignty bill”  is to “simply send a message to Congress that we believe in the 10th Amendment.  We believe that you do not have a right to do certain things.   And set that as our official policy and if the federal government violates the 10th Amendment it gives us some standing in courts.  That is one of the precidents that we can point to when we say ‘we tried to assert our rights and you ignored it,’ when we seek relief in the courts.”

This measure was hotly debated in the 2009 part of the session and may come up again soon, says Senator Grooms.

Attorney General continues Sanford investigation

As the new year begins, South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster continues with an investigation into Governor Mark Sanford’s business trips and other actions while in office to determine if there has been any criminal wrong doing.

“We’re reviewing a mass of documents and doing research in my office,” says McMaster, “and other than that, it would be inappropriate for me to comment about the investigation, because I may be called upon to make a prosecutorial decision.” 

McMaster talks about the possibility of his using information in his case from the ongoing investigation by the state Ethics Commission.  “It depends on the thoroughness of that information and any gaps or lack of gaps that may be there,” says McMaster.  “There may be additional information that’s needed, or there may not be.  That’s what we’re determining.”

SC Supreme Court to hear election case

The South Carolina Supreme Court will hear arguments this week in a case that will determine whether political candidates who lose a primary election can run in a general election, but affiliated with a different political party.

The high court will consider the case of Eugene Platt, who lost the Democratic Party’s nomination for the South Carolina House in 2008 but then tried to run during the general election as candidate for the Green Party.  A candidate is currently allowed to represent more than one party, but is prevented from running in the same election cycle after losing a primary election.

Platt is being represented by the American Civil Liberties Union out of Atlanta.

Forrest Truett Nettles II of the Nettles Law Office of Charleston is representing the Charleston County Democratic Party, which sought an injunction against Platt after he tried to run in the general election.

A decision in the Supreme Court case will simply clarify what’s allowable in future elections.

The case will likely be heard Wednesday.

Senate bill requires training, tougher penalties on home daycare

Compiled by Matt Long, SCRN

A Columbia mother has devoted much of her time towards a bill that sits in committee awaiting the upcoming half of the legislative session. Senate bill S.348, known by supporters as “Kendra’s Law,” would require the Department of Social Services to provide a training course for home childcare providers and sets a minimum two-year prison sentence for any such provider who physically harms a child.

The bill has been set for special order in the Senate and Gaddie says she thinks there are enough votes to pass and be sent to the House.

The proposed law is named for Kendra Gaddie, a seven-month old child who was slapped and shaken by a caretaker. The injuries nearly killed her. Kendra’s mother, Michelle Gaddie, has been pushing the bill for two years. Gaddie says there is currently no punishment for daycare providers who harm children. [Read more...]

Barrett calls for review of national security policy

Congressman Gresham Barrett wants a comprehensive review of U.S. security policy. He says the attempted Christmas Day terrorist attack on a Northwest Airlines jet is evidence in support of keeping the Guantanamo Bay facility open.

Barrett says both the Christmas Day plot and the incident at Ft. Hood, Texas in November could have been prevented had it not been for systemic failures within the Obama Administration security policy.

The Third District Representative says two former Guantanamo Bay detainees were allegedly instrumental in the Christmas Day plot.  “The detainees who were released  were released under the Bush Administration,” he says.  “And the Obama Administration has talked about doing the same.  But Guantanamo was built for that reason and I’m a strong advocate of keeping it open.   And we need to be super vigilant about what we do with the detainees.”  

Barrett, a former Army Captain, says the U.S. needs a new comprehensive national security policy. [Read more...]