May 21, 2012

Legislative Update: May 16

Headlines from the SC State Capitol:

Gov. Nikki Haley points to the growth in the Senate budget vs. the House version during a press conference Tuesday

–Most of the attention throughout the week will be on the Senate budget debate, as lawmakers there will debate a $6.1 billion General Fund. Gov. Nikki Haley stepped into the debate herself Tuesday, calling on lawmakers to include $93 million in tax cuts as part of the final plan. Haley said the budget was over $400 million more than her office first proposed. Senate leaders resisted, saying the budget already includes more than $752 million in tax relief.

–The House Ethics Committee has called a meeting Friday to rehear a complaint against Gov. Nikki Haley. The panel dismissed the complaint filed by Republican activist John Rainey two weeks ago. At the time, committee members found “probable cause” (a move which made their investigation public for the first time), but moments later voted 5-1 to dismiss the charges. Rep. James Smith (D-Columbia) filed a resolution Tuesday asking that the committee reconsider the complaint.

–The South Carolina Republican Party will hear from five candidates who were removed from next month’s primary ballots. SCGOP Executive Director Matt Moore told South Carolina Radio Network that those five cases were “extraordinary” and deserved a chance of appeal. At least two of those candidates appealing said they were only following instructions from party officials when they violated the law. The Supreme Court ruled candidates who did not file their financial paperwork and candidacy forms simultaneously were not allowed to be certified.

Panel agrees to rehear Haley ethics complaint

A South Carolina House ethics panel will rehear a complaint that accuses Governor Nikki Haley of violating state ethics laws while she was still serving in the state legislature.

Gov. Haley has called the complaint a "political vendetta" (File)

Democratic lawmakers had requested that the House Ethics Committee reconsider its decision to dismiss ethics charges against Governor Nikki Haley.

Rep. James Smith filed a resolution Tuesday asking the House Ethics Committee to reopen its probe. Earlier this month, the committee voted to dismiss accusations that then Rep.-Haley violated ethics rules when she worked as a fundraiser with a Lexington hospital and as a consultant with an engineering firm seeking state projects.

But Democrats criticized the decision. “Clearly the Ethics Committee found probable cause with a 6-0 vote, then dismissed it without investigation,” said House Minority Leader Harry Ott (D-St. Matthews).

The Ethics Committee has scheduled a meeting 10 a.m. Friday to rehear the complaint.

[Read more...]

SCGOP hears from disqualified candidates “to bring closure”

SC GOP Chairman Chad Connelly

Wednesday, state Republican Party officials will hear the complaints of five candidates who were kicked out of the upcoming primary because of confusion in how to file the required election paperwork.

Matt Moore, executive director of the state party says, “Tomorrow’s hearings are meant to bring closure to this issue from the party’s perspective. The state executive committee of the Republican Party will give these individuals a chance to make their case, and then decide. These hearings will be fair and unbiased.”

A citizen’s lawsuit prompted the South Carolina Supreme Court to disqualify some candidates who incorrectly filed campaign paperwork.  

Moore says, “These were cases where the facts were a little bit extraordinary. These were maybe unique cases where it warranted the full state committee hearing the cases.”

One of those appearing in front of the state committee is John Pettigrew, a local party veteran in Edgefield.

“I went in to file and did my intention of candidacy and pledge. I asked where the economic disclosures were to fill out and I was told by the party official, ‘No,  There’s nothing else to fill out with me. You go online to the Ethics Commission website and do it within 10 days, ’” says Pettigrew. “I took him at his word, seven days later I filed my economic interest report.”

Because of his not filing the economic disclosures at the same time, Pettigrew was disqualified by the Supreme Court ruling. He now hopes to be re-certified by the state party.

Regardless, he says he is not giving up; “I’m going to appeal my decision and after that, I feel like I owe it to my supporters to look at all avenues including possible petition candidacy, possible legal action. I just have to evaluate all my options.”

SC GOP’s Moore says after the hearings, the state GOP committee will decide whether to petition the state or take legal measures to have the names added.

One of those who will not have a hearing with the state GOP Wednesday is John Steinberger in Charleston, who wanted to run for the seat vacated by Sen. Glenn McConnell, who had to take over as lieutenant governor this year. 

“I can’t speak to dirty tricks, but it’s just profoundly disappointing when they do what they think is the right thing and then they are told they are off the ballot,” says Steinberger. “So, I’ve just decided to move on and look at a different race.”

Steinberger plans to challenge House Speaker Bobby Harrell as a petition candidate.

Candidate for Georgetown County Auditor, Rod Stalvey, says the day he signed up to run there was no computer available to file online as required. He filed a protest to the state party but has not been given a hearing.

“Of course there are some that are not happy and we’re talking to them continually. Of course the possibility for a lawsuit always exists, we live in a really litigious society,” says Moore. “But the bottom line is that the party used the Supreme Court’s ruling and applicable state law to certify as many candidates as we could certify under the law. And those that didn’t get certified didn’t meet the law’s criteria and we were not willing to go above and beyond what the law and the Supreme Court said.”

Moore says the party will make changes in how filings are done in the future and they are “firmly behind” state lawmakers clarifying filing laws.  Last week, the Legislature was not able to move along a bill that tried to remedy the problem and return all candidates to the June 12 primary ballot.

He says he thinks the Legislature next year will quickly take up changes to campaign filing laws.

Haley on Rainey: He’s wasting voters’ time, he’s wasting my time

Rainey asked full SC House to take up his complaints

John Rainey continues the battle against Gov. Nikki Haley, asking the full South Carolina House to take up his complaint that she violated ethics laws when she worked for the Lexington Medical Center Foundation while she served Lexington in the House.

Rainey, a Republican is an attorney who led the state’s Board of Economic Advisors for eight years and was once CEO of the state-owned power utility, Santee Cooper.

He has said on many occasions that Gov. Haley lacks integrity.

This month, the House Ethics Committee dismissed Rainey’s charges as lacking evidence.  Earlier this year, a state circuit judge heard a lawsuit from Rainey on the same matter and declared that his court was not the correct venue for legislative ethics questions.

Friday, Rainey appealed to the S.C. House to reconsider the corruption complaint that was dismissed by its ethics panel.

Gov. Haley today responded to South Carolina Radio Network’s question about the renewed Rainey complaint:

“This is a political vendetta that has gone to its highest extreme. I mean, it’s embarrassing for him. The courts have dismissed it, the ethics committee has dismissed it. This is just a man that’s angry that I won and won’t stop until he gets his way. He’s wasting taxpayers’ time, he’s wasting voters’ time, he’s wasting my time and I have nothing further to say about it,” Haley said.

 

Rep. Clyburn: This will be the mother of all lame duck sessions

Congressman Joe Wilson fought for a bill in the U.S. House to divert a massive defense budget cut set for the first of the year. The $600 million dollars defense spending cuts were triggered by a joint congressional supercommittee’s failure to reach a deal to cut federal spending.

Rep. Wilson and fellow Republicans are now facing criticism that they cut funding to programs that serve the poor in order to protect the military. The bill, H.R. 5652, which is called the “Sequester Replacement Act,” would reduce some of the cuts to defense by instead cutting from social program block grants.  Wilson says the money will come from reducing the automatic growth of some programs.

“It’s additional costs. The actual reduction is from an anticipated 125-percent increase in costs to a reduction to 123-percent…a minimal reduction but a lot of money,”says Wilson.

But the house bill is likely to fail in the Senate.

“I’m very concerned that the Senate is simply not functional,” says Wilson. “Any legislation that could be perceived as controversial doesn’t even get to a vote.”

Clyburn prepared for "the mother of all lame duck sessions"

Congressman James Clyburn, a Democratic leader who served on the supercommittee, says Congress is more likely to take up this issue after the upcoming General Election.

“What we are going to see in November after the elections is the mother of all lame ducks,” Clyburn told MSNBC Monday. “I do believe that so much of this will be worked out in a lame duck session. I know that a lot of things are on the table. I don;t believe that we’ll fix sequester for 10 years; we might do a one-year fix.”

Clyburn says Congress will need that year to get the sequestration cuts worked out for the long term.