CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story reported that Charleston County “reclassified” homes as rental properties, attributing Sen. McConnell. The county says it does not do this, but tries to keep the 4 percent property tax in place as long as the home is actually a primary residence.
As always, we know the public depends on us for accurate information and we regret any errors.
—
Homeowners along South Carolina’s coast are being unfairly charged higher taxes because they rent out their property for a few weeks each summer, according to Republicans in the state Senate. Those senators accuse coastal counties (specifically Charleston County) of broadly interpreting the state’s tax laws.
At issue is how state law allows counties to calculate property tax. After Act 388 passed in 2006, owner-occupied homes could not be taxed for school operating expenses while rental properties could. As a result, an owner-occupied property tax is limited to four percent while a rental’s is capped at six percent.
However, the law does not address the issue of a primary residence that the owner also rents out occasionally.
The issue recently cropped up in Charleston County, after some residents accused the local assessor’s office of reclassifying some homes as rental property if the owner rented it out for more than two weeks each year. Charleston County officials deny that. “We approve a 4 percent assessment ratio for those who rent for more than two weeks in a year as long as they are otherwise residents,” County Administrator Allen O’Neal said in an email.
That infuriated state Sen. Glenn McConnell (R-Charleston), the powerful President pro tempore who represents the area.











